Nvidia 1650 Vs Amd Rx 580

AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Price now 215$

Games supported 90%

Toll now 215$

Games supported 85%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating	164	191
Value for coin	36.97	twoscore.19
Compages	Polaris (2016−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris xx	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2017 (5 years ago)	23 Apr 2019 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	$149
Current price	$215 (0.9x MSRP)	$215 (1.4x MSRP)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, just for precise cess you take to consider their benchmark and gaming exam results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	896
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,700 meg
Manufacturing process applied science	14 nm	12 nm
Thermal blueprint power (TDP)	185 Watt	75 Watt
Texture make full charge per unit	193.0	93.24
Floating-indicate performance	vi,175 gflops	no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology'south interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), boosted ability connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	two-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

Retentivity

Parameters of retentiveness installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Annotation that GPUs integrated into processors accept no dedicated VRAM and utilise a shared part of organisation RAM.

Memory blazon	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM corporeality	8 GB	4 GB
Retention motorcoach width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	8000 MHz
Retention bandwidth	256.0 GB/due south	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a dominion, data in this section is precise just for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Brandish Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	half-dozen.4	six.five
OpenGL	4.half-dozen	4.six
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.ii.131
CUDA	no data	7.v

Benchmark performance

Not-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Annotation that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, only if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, nosotros normally set problems quickly.

• Passmark
• 3DMark Vantage Operation
• 3DMark eleven Performance GPU
• 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
• 3DMark Fire Strike Score
• 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
• 3DMark Water ice Storm GPU

This is probably the well-nigh ubiquitous criterion, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with ii scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located within a sea cavern, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a caught planet. Information technology was discontinued in Apr 2017, and Fourth dimension Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX eleven benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on ii scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Merely similar Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two split up tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, role of 3DMark suite. Water ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. Information technology utilizes DirectX 11 characteristic level ix to display a battle between two space fleets most a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Gaming performance

Let'south encounter how expert the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Hither are the average frames per second in a large set of pop games across different resolutions:

Total HD	98	70
1440p	43	39
4K	36	23

Popular games

• Full Hd
  Low Preset
• Full Hard disk drive
  Medium Preset
• Total HD
  High Preset
• Total Hd
  Ultra Preset
• 1440p
  High Preset
• 1440p
  Ultra Preset
• 4K
  Loftier Preset
• 4K
  Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

thirty−33

24−27

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	58 +9.4%	53 −ix.iv%
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −56.seven%	47 +56.7%
Battlefield 5	124 +103%	61 −103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −153%	76 +153%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−33 +15.4%	24−27 −fifteen.4%
Far Weep five	83 +22.one%	68 −22.ane%
Far Cry New Dawn	83 +25.8%	66 −25.eight%
Forza Horizon 4	108 +20%	ninety −20%
Hitman 3	30−33 −153%	76 +153%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −83.iii%	55 +83.three%
Red Expressionless Redemption 2	30−33 −73.3%	52 +73.three%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 +27.6%	58 −27.six%
Scout Dogs: Legion	xxx−33 −86.7%	56 +86.7%

Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey	47 +0%	47 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −16.vii%	35 +xvi.7%
Battlefield 5	102 +92.five%	53 −92.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −93.3%	58 +93.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +15.iv%	24−27 −15.4%
Far Cry five	76 +22.6%	62 −22.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	78 +25.eight%	62 −25.8%
Forza Horizon 4	101 +21.7%	83 −21.7%
Hitman iii	30−33 −107%	62 +107%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −36.7%	41 +36.seven%
Metro Exodus	48 +37.i%	35 −37.1%
Ruby Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +7.1%	28 −seven.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +34%	47 −34%
The Witcher 3: Wild Chase	72 −ii.8%	74 +2.viii%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −60%	48 +60%

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	34 +36%	25 −36%
Assassin'south Creed Valhalla	30−33 +131%	13 −131%
Battlefield 5	93 +82.iv%	51 −82.iv%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +15.four%	24−27 −15.4%
Far Weep 5	71 +22.4%	58 −22.4%
Far Weep New Dawn	71 +24.6%	57 −24.6%
Forza Horizon 4	82 +26.2%	65 −26.2%
The Witcher three: Wild Hunt	44 +four.8%	42 −4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.ix%

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −20%	36 +20%
Hitman 3	30−33 −23.iii%	37 +23.three%
Horizon Cypher Dawn	30−33 +15.4%	26 −15.four%
Metro Exodus	28 +40%	20 −40%
Red Expressionless Redemption 2	thirty−33 +76.5%	17 −76.five%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +three.four%	29 −3.4%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +66.7%	18 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +131%	13 −131%
Battlefield five	30−33 −thirty%	39 +xxx%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +15.four%	24−27 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	thirty−33 −xxx%	39 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	53 +29.3%	41 −29.three%
Forza Horizon 4	thirty−33 −53.iii%	46 +53.3%
Lookout man Dogs: Legion	thirty−33 +114%	14 −114%

Call of Duty: Mod Warfare	30−33 +50%	xx −fifty%
Hitman iii	30−33 +57.9%	xix −57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +100%	15 −100%
Metro Exodus	18 +50%	12 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −fifteen.four%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20 +53.viii%	xiii −53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 +3.eight%	26 −iii.8%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 +38.v%	xiii −38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +500%	five −500%
Battlefield 5	37 +76.2%	21 −76.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−33 +fifteen.4%	24−27 −15.iv%
Far Weep 5	26 +36.8%	xix −36.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 +38.ane%	21 −38.1%
Forza Horizon 4	41 +36.7%	30 −36.vii%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +275%	eight −275%

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	30.eleven	26.40
Novelty	18 April 2017	23 April 2019
Cost	$229	$149
Retentivity bus width	256	128
Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	896
Retentiveness bandwidth	256	128
Scrap lithography	fourteen nm	12 nm
Thermal design ability (TDP)	185 Watt	75 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Radeon RX 580

since it shows improve performance.

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall reply.

Cast your vote

Do yous recollect we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button well-nigh your favorite graphics card.

---

Competitors of Radeon RX 580 past NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 580'southward NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX 1060 v GB, which is faster by 2% and higher by two positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 580:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 from AMD is Radeon RX 580X, which is almost equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 100

Like GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less shut to those reviewed, providing yous with more than options to consider.

User rating

Here you tin see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

---

Rate AMD Radeon RX 580 on a calibration of i to 5:

Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 on a calibration of 1 to v:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

---

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-580-vs-GeForce-GTX-1650

Posted by: eastmansainest1939.blogspot.com

Share this post